Yes, I know about extra GOE for this and that, but, like you, I find Liza underscored vs. Elena.
Some of the GOE is also assigned to things like difficult entries into jumps, etc.
That said, I absolutely agree that Elena's jumps are overscored compared to Liza. Despite the theory, skaters are often not actually marked based on what they do on the ice.
Top six may not quite be possible at this time, with the three Russians, at least two Americans (maybe three since Polina won 4CC) and at least one or two Japanese ladies. That could feasibly make up the top 8 right there. However, it's not out of the question for 9th or 10th for Gabby, which is a perfectly respectable finish and higher than last year's performance.
Good luck Gabby!
Just spent some time going back and watching some of Daleman's long programs from this year and noticed that she keeps changing the program elements. She had the Loop in at first then she took it out - then it was back in in place of the 3 Flip. One event she does a 2T at the end of a 2A - then the next event she puts in on the end of a 3S.
Is this really a good way to become consistent with a program?
And could this be why she had some minor problems with some of her jumping passes - not being sure what she was doing and when? Wouldn't it kind of throw off some of your footwork and set-up into the jumps.
At this stage, I don't see Daleman making the top six. Her style is still very jerky, if that makes sense.
There are three Russians, two US, and at least two Japanese women who are locks for the top ten.
I hope that Daleman and Chartrand at least skate a combined total that allows two Canadian ladies in 2016.
Just spent some time going back and watching some of Daleman's long programs from this year and noticed that she keeps changing the program elements. She had the Loop in at first then she took it out - then it was back in in place of the 3 Flip. One event she does a 2T at the end of a 2A - then the next event she puts in on the end of a 3S.
Is this really a good way to become consistent with a program?
And could this be why she had some minor problems with some of her jumping passes - not being sure what she was doing and when? Wouldn't it kind of throw off some of your footwork and set-up into the jumps.
I think if Daleman can go clean in the SP she can score about 62 to 64 pts and a clean FS with all her triples landed should be (with fair PCS's) about 120 (considering she scored 111 at 4CC with a 2Lz). Combined this would be a score over 180 and should be able to place her in the top 10, which I agree with mrrice, that would be great for her.
No---If she had landed a 3z at 4CC, her SP score would have been about 60-61. Her TES would have gone up, but not necessarily her PCS, since the double did not affect her performance in any way. She did land a 3z in the SP at NHK, and got !, scoring 5.00, so her 4CC score would have gone up to 60.25, which would have put her in 6th place after the SP. Landing a 3z in the FS would give her another 5 points, putting her in 4th place overall---at 4CC.
She flutzed in the short at NHK, but she did two clean lutzes in the FS at NHK. Also she did a clean lutz at 4CC. So I don't know why you are saying she is flutzer. Yes she lips her flip nd that is why I think they have taken it out of her programs.
But Daleman doesn't land a clean lutz---she flutzes, and got a ! at NHK for it, so she won't get 6.6 points for a 3z!
And you can't 'decide' that Daleman should have PCS comparable to Hongo, who has had results better than Daleman this season: Hongo was ranked 7th overall in the GP season with a gold medal at CoR, while Daleman was 17th.
Sure Daleman could score higher if she skated clean and didn't flutz. And if Gracie Gold could conquer her nerves and didn't lip, she could beat the Russians and be world champ! The trick is for the skater to DO it, not for fans to just talk about the skater doing it.