This is low key very interesting to me because so many consequences flow from these arbitrary decisions (from a margin of error point of view). At least back in the day you could carry your grudge against one or two judges. Now there are so many inputs that pretend to precise. Is a step sequence really worth 4.40 or 4.45 and if a feature is seen by one judge but not another did a GOE difference change the outcome?? Then the judges need to judge each component, etc. The potential for error just keeps piling up.
I'm being somewhat facetious but yes within a certain margin of error it would be nice to have a tiebreaker to make it clear that this is just a coin flip.
I'm being somewhat facetious but yes within a certain margin of error it would be nice to have a tiebreaker to make it clear that this is just a coin flip.