- Joined
- Feb 27, 2012
She had the banned substance in her body, so the burden of proof is on her. If she can establish proof that it was a cosmetic before Worlds, she can go to Worlds, and no one will call her a cheater.
Barquero tested positive for a *metabolite* of a banned substance.
Whether the banned substance itself was present in Barquero's body is a separate question.
In the case of Calalang, it eventually was shown that it is necessary to distinguish whether a metabolite (4-CPA) is from an innocent source (cosmetic ingredient chlorphenesin) or from a banned substance (meclofenoxate).
I hope that an innocent explanation will come to light for why Barquero tested positive for the metabolite of clostebol.
FWIW, "Clostebol-Positive Urine after Consumption of Contaminated Meat" is the title of a 1992 paper from the scientific literature. I have no idea whether it could be pertinent in Barquero's case, but again, FWIW:
Abstract
We examined the relationship between the consumption of meat from animals treated with anabolic steroids and the detection of these steroids in the athletes consuming this meat. We proved that clostebol metabolites (e.g., 4-chloro-delta-4-androstene-3 alpha-ol-17-one) in the urine of one of the volunteers involved in a feeding experiment were due to accidental consumption of meat contaminated with clostebol acetate. When two volunteers consumed meat (100 g) containing either 1 or 0.1 mg of clostebol acetate, the same metabolite was found in their urine.
Clostebol-Positive Urine after Consumption of Contaminated Meat
Abstract. We examined the relationship between the consumption of meat from animals treated with anabolic steroids and the detection of these steroids in the at
academic.oup.com
Last edited: