There seems to be no rhyme or reason whatsoever to your opinions. You trash everyone who doesn't fit your extremely narrow definition of artistry but yet you like Samarin, one of the emptiest and least artistic skaters in the men's discipline? What?
My definition of artistry isn't narrow, hence why I DO like different programs, entirely independent of the person performing it, and why I "trash" very overscored programs regardless of who the program comes from.
But, LOL, where did I call Samarin a great or even good artist in that post?!? I said he was undermarked technically and he improved his presentation since his last Grand Prix event. With how quickly he is showing improvement, he seems like someone who could become a big force on the competitive scene. I highly disagree he is one of the "emptiest and least artistic skaters", based upon the performance he just gave. He was showing a great amount of energy and more attention to usage of his limbs than what some of the other competitors are doing.
I just reviewed his 4Lutz and it appears exactly 1/4 short. Not the best technique on the jump, but the panel not giving benefit of the doubt here seems like they are marking him down just for being a newbie.