The 6.0 System | Golden Skate

The 6.0 System

TryMeLater

On the Ice
Joined
Mar 31, 2013
I was watching a news segment on the World Air-Guitar Championships (yep, that's a thing) and noticed that they use a 6.0 scoring system albeit without ordinals.
Which other competitions that you know off use a 6.0 system?
 
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
... the World Air-Guitar Championships (yep, that's a thing) ...

:rock: I couldn't get past that line. :)

Maybe figure skating and air guitar are the only two sports that use it!

I will say, though, that I once went to a figure skating show where ice dancer Ben Agosto played his guitar as part of his skating routine. In the peformance that I attended the power went out, and he was left playing guitar with no sound while gliding and twizzling.

Edit: Here is the recent world championship performance. 6.0 5.9 6.0 5.9 5.8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbZc70afngg
 
Last edited:

NymphyNymphy

On the Ice
Joined
Aug 26, 2017
The announcers must of hated their jobs in the 6.0 system. Having to say 5.8 5.9 5.8 5.8 5.9 over and over again would drive me insane.
 
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Is it really 6.0 if it's not ordinals?

Well, it is ordinals in the sense that after you get your 5.8s and 5.9s, they are tallied and and ordinal placements, first, second and third are awarded to the highest scorers.

What's missing is factored ordinals to put more weight on the LP versus the SP. As far as i can tell from the video, the competitors give two equally weighted performances before five judges. For each performance the highest and lowest scores are dropped and the three remaining are totaled. Highest possible total is 18 points for each segment, so 36 for the competition.

This performer (Seven Seas) got 35.8. That was 17.8 for the first act and 18.0 (straight 6.0s) for the second act. :)
 
Joined
Dec 9, 2017
Well, it is ordinals in the sense that after you get your 5.8s and 5.9s, they are tallied and and ordinal placements, first, second and third are awarded to the highest scorers.

Haha, I guess in a way, every scoring system is ordinals. :laugh: But you know what I meant there. ;)
 
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
The announcers must of hated their jobs in the 6.0 system. Having to say 5.8 5.9 5.8 5.8 5.9 over and over again would drive me insane.

I don't know about the announcers, but it was great fun for the audience when that row of scores popped up. Then you got to shout, "Hey, what's wrong with that Yugoslavian judge to give my skater only a 5.5??!!!"
 
Joined
Dec 9, 2017
I don't know about the announcers, but it was great fun for the audience when that row of scores popped up. Then you got to shout, "Hey, what's wrong with that Yugoslavian judge to give my skater only a 5.5??!!!"

I think it's still fun. "Why did my skater get only a CCoSp3V?! That difficult position was only 10 degrees less than another full rotation, that should still count!! And why only a +1?! That spin was placed in a mostly silent part of music, meaning there wasn't any music it could go with!!"
 

mau

3Lz3Lo3Lo3Lo3Lo
On the Ice
Joined
Feb 13, 2018
I was watching a news segment on the World Air-Guitar Championships (yep, that's a thing) and noticed that they use a 6.0 scoring system albeit without ordinals.
Which other competitions that you know off use a 6.0 system?

Will this become an Olympic sport before Synch Skating? :biggrin:
 

NymphyNymphy

On the Ice
Joined
Aug 26, 2017
I don't know about the announcers, but it was great fun for the audience when that row of scores popped up. Then you got to shout, "Hey, what's wrong with that Yugoslavian judge to give my skater only a 5.5??!!!"

Sometimes I wish we had the ordinal system back. We sacrificed the excitement of the 6.0 system for corruption-prevention. Oh wait.. we still have corruption... Time to bring back the 6.0 system!! At least it was tragically comedic when scandals happened right? Imagine Sochi with the 6.0 system! Eastern European judges giving Yuna's adios program a 5.5 in Artistic Impression. Most of the skating world would be on the ground hollering for days. :laugh2:
 

Sam-Skwantch

“I solemnly swear I’m up to no good”
Record Breaker
Joined
Dec 29, 2013
Country
United-States
I don't know about the announcers, but it was great fun for the audience when that row of scores popped up. Then you got to shout, "Hey, what's wrong with that Yugoslavian judge to give my skater only a 5.5??!!!"

Ohh that Vanessa Riley again :roll5:
 
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
I think it's still fun. "Why did my skater get only a CCoSp3V?! That difficult position was only 10 degrees less than another full rotation, that should still count!! And why only a +1?! That spin was placed in a mostly silent part of music, meaning there wasn't any music it could go with!!"

Well put.

Still, the difference is this. Only a skating expert can indulge in the kind of analysis and criticism that you illustrate, and only after looking at protocols and videos after the fact.

With 6.0, any casual channel-flipper can say, "I enjoyed that performance, give him a 5.9. The other guy was boring."

As for my own experiences as a fan, I have to admit that I am intimidated by the CoP. A panel of authoritative judges and tech specialists tells me, that performance was worth 197.14 points." I think it is those two digits after the decimal point that scare me. Who am I to say, "No, judges, that performance clearly deserved at least 197.39"?

On the other hand, I do enjoy watching the running tally mount up as the current skater chases the leader in tech points.
 
Last edited:

DanseMacabre

Final Flight
Joined
May 27, 2018
Country
Iceland
I will admit that sometimes I miss that 6.0 system.

I miss the immediate visceral impact of seeing a scoreboard light up with 6's after a truly phenomenal skate (like Michelle Kwan at 04 Nationals). Having a code of points makes a lot of sense, but reading protocols after a competition's ended to get the nitty gritty of the score just isn't as special. I feel this way about gymnastics and the 10.0 too. It makes more sense but on an emotional level, it doesn't have the same oomph.
 

gkelly

Record Breaker
Joined
Jul 26, 2003
Well, it is ordinals in the sense that after you get your 5.8s and 5.9s, they are tallied and and ordinal placements, first, second and third are awarded to the highest scorers.

If they're adding up the scores from all the judges (after trimming) for each skater, and not looking at how each judge individually ranked the skaters against each other, then it's not an ordinal system.

Any scoring system for any sport in which multiple athletes/teams compete against each other will come up with an overall ranking of the athletes, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc., at the end of the day. Those are ordinal numbers, but they're not necessarily using ordinals as part of the process to arrive at them.

Usually we refer to the final placements for a competition segment as "placements." And the weighting of placements in individual competition segments to arrive at an overall placement, used in ISU skating starting in 1980-81, was called "factored placements."

"Ordinals" means something different.

The majority or OBO calculations in skating used ordinals. Adding up scores, whether the maximum score is 6.0 or 10.0 or something else, as was done in many professional skating competitions and reality TV shows, is not using ordinals to arrive at the placements, even though the contestants do end up ranked by the panel as a whole at the end of the process (barring any ties).
 

lesnar001

Record Breaker
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Well put.

Still, the difference is this. Only a skating expert can indulge in the kind of analysis and criticism that you illustrate, and only after looking at protocols and videos after the fact.

With 6.0, any casual channel-flipper can say, "I enjoyed that performance, give him a 5.9. The other guy was boring."

As for my own experiences as a fan, I have to admit that I am intimidated by the CoP. A panel of authoritative judges and tech specialists tells me, that performance was worth 197.14 points." I think it is those two digits after the decimal point decimal that scare me. Who am I to say, "No, judges, that performance clearly deserved at least 197.39"?

On the other hand, I do enjoy watching the running tally mount up as the current skater chases the leader in tech points.

IMO the best thing about CoP is that a skater who had a sub-par short program is not neccessarily out of contention.
 

TryMeLater

On the Ice
Joined
Mar 31, 2013
The majority or OBO calculations in skating used ordinals. Adding up scores, whether the maximum score is 6.0 or 10.0 or something else, as was done in many professional skating competitions and reality TV shows, is not using ordinals to arrive at the placements, even though the contestants do end up ranked by the panel as a whole at the end of the process (barring any ties).

Yes, but a scale of 6.0 was always unique to skating.
That's why it's surprising to find other events where they use a 6.0 scale.
Had they used a 10.0 scale or a 5.0 scale, it wouldn't as interesting to me.
 

anonymoose_au

Insert weird opinion here
Record Breaker
Joined
Feb 22, 2014
Country
Australia
I was watching a news segment on the World Air-Guitar Championships (yep, that's a thing) and noticed that they use a 6.0 scoring system albeit without ordinals.
Which other competitions that you know off use a 6.0 system?

:laugh: I know about the World Air-Guitar Championships because I think it might be something that I can actually compete in! I've got a mighty fine air guitar repitoire if I say so myself. ;)

But I didn't know it had a 6.0 judging system! That's interesting, I'd have thought they'd take it up to 11.0 ;)

I miss the 6.0 system in skating...because I'm mathematically challenged and trying to figure out CoP is too hard for me. Plus I liked the judging not been anonymous so you could see who gave what score and if there was an outlier you could spot them right up. In the current system who knows what's happening there!
 
Top