I agree harsher UR rule is bad! I mean, those kind of UR's are not even perceptable for a panel of judges (according to their scores they are giving in real time), even less for the casual viewers! I can find agreements with that kind of strictness only if GOE of pannel of judges stay intacted after the calls tech pannel can make after the review. Cause I dont think its right to be able to rework the GOE scores after tech pannel reviews, panel of judges should judge according to their own eyes, not with the eyes of tech panel/their equipment!
One of my problems with the scoring is that under-rotation, wrong edge, and popped jumps are SO heavily penalized that a fall could be better on a score than any of these. A fall on a jump that's fully rotated still gets base value before GOE is applied. A one-point deduction after that might still come up with a higher total point value than a low GOE applied to a 75% base value jump due to UR or wrong edge.
There was a lot of talk about wanting to apply points in a way that didn't allow 'splat fests' to win. But the math does not support that theory.
Yes, I would all agree with all of this. It's a double whammy to start knocking off GOE points after you've already knocked a percentage off for the base value. By all means increase the percentage off so it's what you want the jump to be in the order of, but at that point then apply the other deductions e.g. for poor landing and so on (and at the original GOE value - the skater didn't intend to UR or get an edge call), but not for URs and edge calls, these have already been accounted for by the percentage reduction.
That way 'clean' URs would score better than now, but poor landings and so on would result in the jump being penalised just as much as now.