- Joined
- Mar 23, 2014
I love Evgenia, but I feel she answers the questions indirectly most of the time. Maybe it is her English, or just her being "mature"; it's better to comment in a generic way.
About the coaching change, her answer was “I can’t say one way is better or worse,” “It is just another way.”
While Tursynbayeva said "Completely different mentality, of course. Both groups have their pros and cons. With Eteri Georgievna, we train a lot, we work a lot, every day, no indulgences. And this is good, it is very hardening, good to train. At competitions, it is easier - as it is said, difficult in training, easy in battle. In Toronto, the relationship is more friendly. I like to train with Eteri Georgievna, this is my thing."
For me,I look for direct answers in interviewers, and to a casual figure skating fan, they are more satisfying. If I want to know what is the difference in training methods, Tursynbayev gave better answers, albert it is from her perspective.
I'm not sure what language Elisabet's interview was conducted in or if it was translated - but we know Evgenia gave her interview in English and it was presented in English. She has to keep it short and vague - she's not good with the language, and the more she talks, the more she is likely to say the wrong thing and make people mad.
The complexity of Elisabet's statement makes me think that the interview was conducted in a language that she is more familiar with than Evgenia is with English.