Let's not cause trouble by reopening this can of worms. Not that I'm biased or anything. :dev2:
I honestly do not think the 1994 was a controversial result. It was not 5-4 or 6--3 even. There are preferences on both sides but that alone does not make something controversial. I think the judges made a call based on the speed, size of the elements, difficulty of the program etc. that gave G/G a small cushion. I don't fault them for that. G/G needed a fall to lose that gold.
This is neither here nor there, but I think this is exactly what should have happened in 2002. B/S should have had their G/G skating skills/tougher program cushion and still won in a 7-2 or 8-1 vote.
I liked G&G but M&D were just better during that event. Everyone and their mother loved G&G though so I really think unless they had like 3 falls would they have not gotten the gold.