- Joined
- Feb 13, 2018
I wonder if they'll be the same length? Like 3 minutes each or something
https://rsport.ria.ru/20190826/1557921557.html
2) if now ratio between TES and PCS is presumably 50:50 - then in technical program weight of PCS will be 40%, in artistic program - 60%
https://rsport.ria.ru/20190826/1557921557.html
New clarifications from Lakernik:
1) changes (if approved) will be adopted only after 2022
2) if now ratio between TES and PCS is presumably 50:50 - then in technical program weight of PCS will be 40%, in artistic program - 60%
3) in artistic program complexity will take a back seat. Skaters in that programs will do jumps, spins etc. too - but amount of elements will be less and their weight will be significantly lower
In fact the one thing that the IJS does do is provide a variety of ways to score points so each skater can design his program to maximize his strengths.
Could any kind soul give us non-Russophones a full translation?
I'd greatly prefer it called the Flexible or Freestyle program rather than Artistic.
And rather than "Technical", call it the "Full" program.
It's words of Lakernik - I didn't add anything from myself :confused2: You can check it yourself through google translate - if you don't believe me. I omitted some lines which everybody knows already and left only key points though.
Maybe they should get rid of gender separation in the artistic program, make it an intergender competition.
I understand the reasoning for the division of genders in FS, after all, on average, women jump fewer revolutions in the air compared to men, so without separating them women would have fewer chances to win things.
However artistic program should be an ultimate equalizer for genders, an emphasis wouldn't be on the jumps, hence, why not make it a competition where everyone can participate.
Who wouldn't want to see Yuzuru battle it out with, let's say, Yuna, for the title of the world artistic figure skating champion?
A little bit off topic here, but to me these little mini-spirals look better when men do them than ladies. I wish ladies would do more extended spirals where they hold the position longer.
Same with camel spins and spread eagles. To me, these are manish moves that enhance a man's program. But for ladies nothing beats a layback spin and an ina Bauer.
I know, I know, that's sexist. Women gymnasts should do the high bar and the rings.
Freestyle is a great name. They could've introduced a new freestyle/extreme disciplines for gliders/quadsters if they want more medals and leave the existing all-around single skating as it is.I'd greatly prefer it called the Flexible or Freestyle program rather than Artistic. Because it's the flexibility and freedom that is needed to do more artistic programs. But it's still not an artistic contest and the "Artistic" label is just going to cause confusion.
To tell the truth this 4Lz phenomenon is utterly baffling to me. Only a few years ago we thought that a 4Lz was beyond the physical capabilities of the human body. Now all of a sudden little girls barely teenagers are throwing them off right and left, nothing to it. Want to see that with an intricate entry and arms over the head? OK.
Alysa Liu can do a 4Lz, but she can't do a 4T or a 4S -- too hard. (?)
As for points, people will do ANYTHING for points. If you offer someone 10 points he might say, nuts to you , that's too hard. Solution? Give him 20. He'll be in the harness the next day.
In general, though, I don't think there is anything much that the ISU can do about it. What is easy for one skater is hard for another. In fact the one thing that the IJS does do is provide a variety of ways to score points so each skater can design his program to maximize his strengths.
Apocalypse.Who wouldn't want to see Yuzuru battle it out with, let's say, Yuna, for the title of the world artistic figure skating champion?
That's because they are not true 4lzes. It's infuriating to see ISU let that happen. Only Jin, Chen, Kolyada and Hanyu's 4lzes should have been ratified imo (i didn't give a close look to Samarin's).
Zhou?
Sure, some have been < but he's also completely gotten round. I don't see an edge problem either.
Massive pre-rotation.
I'll have to go back and look when I have time, but I don't recall it being horrific.
I certainly don't remember it being like Shoma's 4F, for example.
That's ~90 for Yuzu - not 0, but it's okay. Definitely better than 180.Watch the difference.
https://mobile.twitter.com/corszk1220/status/1139264295051468800
Very different from Yuzu's who has 0 pre-rotation or Boyang's who has very minimal pre-rotation.
That's ~90 for Yuzu - not 0, but it's okay. Definitely better than 180.
Watch the difference.
https://mobile.twitter.com/corszk1220/status/1139264295051468800
Very different from Yuzu's who has 0 pre-rotation or Boyang's who has very minimal pre-rotation.