Long and healthy is not at all counterintutive if the only way to succeed in a sport is to skate for three years, and then quit at 17 or 18 because you can’t take it any more, I don’t *ever* want to watch that sport. Luckily, since I love the men, I don’t need to.
And with many skaters skating long healthy and happy careers, we see so many more skaters grow, challenge, develop rivalries, develop new rivalries: everything that sport should be, IMO:agree:
It would be a boring skating world if we all liked the same thing. But it doesn’t mean we denigrate those who like something different. I say if someone wants to see revolutions in the air, a million different movements (and I am trying to be neutral in my terms, that’s just what I call them), whatever floats their boat, good for them.:thumbsup: I like something different, good for me:thumbsup:
How could any new rivalries develop if it’s all the same small pool of skaters for many years? If barrier to entry into competitive events is too low, it’s unfair to those not selected of equal capabilities. If the barrier is as high as it is now, it is taxing to the point when maintaining competitive shape for a number of years borders on health issues.
Males develop slower and retain lean mass better over years, because they don’t have hormonal reproductive pressure. They perform better when lean, handle fasting better.
Pushing for delay of entry into the competition, and insisting on longer stay in the sport for women will result in selection leaning towards either the ladies predisposed naturally to higher levels of male hormones or the ones that would jeopardize their hormonal balance by the simplest method possible, food deprivation. It’s by far more dangers imo, than letting the vibrant teens compete. They had years of training.