- Joined
- Aug 17, 2017
Clearly there are rules, rules that are for selection of the athletes. Rules that make sense, rules that are there because they are needed to decide fairly, who gets to go. I think we all agree on that point. But stubbornly holding onto these rules is not logical, when the reality is that there are no better men than Hanyu and Uno in Japan. Standing wise they are the top two men in the WORLD. No one comes NEAR them. And since there are three spots (yes, I'm a broken record) one of the second tier skater gets their ticket anyway. They can count themselves lucky for that. No need to take two other men to the Olympics who will be pressed to crack Top 20. If the japanese fed does that they are insane. It'll never happen.
Is there any country that can choose by ignoring selection criteria?
I remember the example of Michelle Kwan in 2006.
In Japan, I think it is difficult to make a selection that ignores such selection criteria.
There are cases where discussions have been held over representatives such as marathons and swimming in the past. Ignoring the selection criteria, you will be sued for Court of Arbitration for Sport.
The Japanese Olympic selection criteria this time is much more gradual.
It was impossible for a competitor who does not participate in the National to be chosen. For that reason, gold medalist arakawa of the world championship and takahashi of the pre-Olympic gold medalist also went to the national despite injuries.
Even though it was a world gold medalist, it was necessary to follow the selection criteria.
I am concerned about the selection criteria of each country. Is there any possibility that leading competitors from other countries will not be chosen?
Can Chan and Nathan surely become Olympic representatives?

