I'm creating this thread for conversation to shed light on the fact that in figure skating, there has always been behind-the-scenes finagling, politicking, networking, etc., from the very beginning. Figure skating has always been a niche, elitist sport too. That's how it evolved. Judging controversies and debates have little to nothing to do with 'conspiracies.' Even Salt Lake City was about figure skating skating as usual. It just happened on a larger scale, and it crossed the line into a conspiracy when a mob figure was discovered to have been involved, no matter how they are still trying to deny to this day that a bargain was reached, facilitated by behind-the-scenes finagling. Ironically, none of it was actually necessary for the skaters involved who were very good, e.g., the ice dance team who won, should have won. They were that good. Anissina/Piezarat didn't need any deal to be made by feds or judges with a tit-for-tat bargain involving pairs.
It's not like, such things as the Salt Lake City scandal had never happened before. In general, there was notorious European bloc judging. There has been consensus scoring among judges based on country politicking. It still happens to a degree. But it also makes a difference how skaters actually perform. The new judging system was actually created to protect the judges rather than to be fair to the athletes. That's one of the reasons why the judges were made anonymous post-2002 Olympics, which was not a good idea. That's why it was eventually scrapped. There are still huge problems with the judging system, although a lot of good can be said about those people who worked on trying to create a better system. They had been working for awhile, probably in vain too. It was only the 2002 Olympic scandal that made the ISU quickly institute COP/IJS, which was not actually fully completed, nor tested. All very laughable and ridiculous, and the reason why so many rules changes have had to be instituted over the years since.
Still, had the French judge not guiltily caved due to the media's and the crowd's vociferous reactions, nothing would have been done. Not much would have changed. She just needed to say that how she scored was based on her perception due to thus and so about the skaters' performances, etc. Everything is so subjective that had she done so, that cheating scandal (which is the tip of the iceberg in fs cheating scandals) would have been pasted over eventually (except of course if the mob figure involvement was never uncovered later). There's also no doubt that Didier Gailhauguet was involved in how the French judge scored the event. The IOC was mad at the ISU for the worldwide media eruption, not because of unfair judging, or inequities in the judging system.
It's not like, such things as the Salt Lake City scandal had never happened before. In general, there was notorious European bloc judging. There has been consensus scoring among judges based on country politicking. It still happens to a degree. But it also makes a difference how skaters actually perform. The new judging system was actually created to protect the judges rather than to be fair to the athletes. That's one of the reasons why the judges were made anonymous post-2002 Olympics, which was not a good idea. That's why it was eventually scrapped. There are still huge problems with the judging system, although a lot of good can be said about those people who worked on trying to create a better system. They had been working for awhile, probably in vain too. It was only the 2002 Olympic scandal that made the ISU quickly institute COP/IJS, which was not actually fully completed, nor tested. All very laughable and ridiculous, and the reason why so many rules changes have had to be instituted over the years since.
Still, had the French judge not guiltily caved due to the media's and the crowd's vociferous reactions, nothing would have been done. Not much would have changed. She just needed to say that how she scored was based on her perception due to thus and so about the skaters' performances, etc. Everything is so subjective that had she done so, that cheating scandal (which is the tip of the iceberg in fs cheating scandals) would have been pasted over eventually (except of course if the mob figure involvement was never uncovered later). There's also no doubt that Didier Gailhauguet was involved in how the French judge scored the event. The IOC was mad at the ISU for the worldwide media eruption, not because of unfair judging, or inequities in the judging system.