Page 19 of the McLaren report part II says:
Results of 69 sample bottles are listed in the Forensic report. There's an obvious discrepancy, unless we believe that 25 sample bottles are from members of the female ice hockey team and that's not likely. Anyway, even if an athlete is on the protected list, the sample bottle has type 1 scratch marks and the analytical findings regarding salt levels / dna are normal - is this a definite proof that the sample has been tampered with? I don't think so. Type 2 scratch marks and/or tampered with urine are proof imho, type 1 scratch marks only are not enough imho.
But the most likely candidates for duchess list are endurance athletes like speed skaters or cross country athletes. Wouldn't they compete in multiple events thereby increasing the number of sample bottle while not increasing the number of protected athletes. Maybe I'm misunderstanding you here and I admit that when I look at the daily medal count report with all of the blacked out names it feels overwhelming considering the amount of time I usually have to glance at the report which I'm still only on page 84 of :shocked: