interesting read.Except that that is specifically what did not happen in this case. At multiple points during the explanation in the document, you can find the very specific wording of “While his marks were in the corridor, his marks were overall higher" and it even outright states "A Judge’s marks need not be outside the corridor before they can be considered as bias." Doug Williams was found guilty not of judging outside of the corridor, but of a violation of the duties of judges and the ISU Code of Ethics.
For those of you who are interested in how and why his scores got flagged despite that, here's a document explaining the work of the Officials Assessment Commission. Very fascinating read, in my opinion.
How many errors would have Fortin made then. Just curious. (seems that one is obvious with the twist, are the others obvious?)