Yes question it, but to keep repeating over and over Mao's jumps were under rotated is annoying. We got it the first time
This thread (which I didn't start) is discussing Mao's underrotations. If you don't like to read anything about that topic, you are free to ignore this thread. :disapp:
"The callers" also gave < to her triple Axel in the SP. I think it's fair to question calls for being either overly strict or overly lenient. Though I question the point of calling a jump "underrotated" when it's a 1/8 turn short - you could just as well say it's underrotated when it's 10° short too.
The important question is at which point a skater should get punished for the "underrotation". Some people or judges are more strict than others. But when a skater underrotates a jump by about 1/4 and apparently *just* doesn't get the < sign from the callers, then it is quite clear to me that it is the judges who at least should be taking a -1 GOE reduction for the jump (how it is written in the rules: -1 for UR without < sign) but judges are obviously not doing that.