2013 worlds was London CANADA. Not Europe
Sorry. I posted from my iPhone, so I didn't notice the flag. So it was only three years in a row in Europe instead of four.
2013 worlds was London CANADA. Not Europe
My issue is this. A take-off of 1/2 turn or less is an acceptable takeoff. A landing of 1/4 turn or less is an acceptable landing. Giving credit for extra rotation means you may be accepting either a deficient takeoff or a deficient landing.
Jumps are not supposed to be landed with more than a 1/4 turn on the ice, no matter how amazing the takeoff is. It isn't a matter of how much someone rotates in the air; just take-off properly and land properly.
Seems that one of BoP's issue with Karen's UR calls is that she doesn't pre-rotate as much as some of the other skaters. So that somehow absolves her from a UR landing because "overall" she's rotating in the air more.
This first part doesn't make sense. If someone has a deficient takeoff (aka, pre-rotating more than they should), then there is no "credit for extra rotation". The jump is inherently going to have less rotation than a "perfectly rotated" jump, unless the person who pre-rotates lands past the point of being backwards. Nobody does that, because trying to land further around than backwards would just make the jump more difficult for you (and landing perfectly backwards on a jump with 1/4 turn extra pre-rotation would already be within the acceptable amount of "total rotation" anyway). Pre-rotating is something people do to cheat a jump, whether they realize it or not.
Moving on, "a landing of 1/4 or less" is ENTIRELY relative to where the jump started and the jump left the ice. How do you even say if a jump was within 1/4 turn on the landing if you have no reference point for where the takeoff started? It would be like texting the following message to your dorm roommate, who is not currently at home: "hey I am going out for exactly 1 hour later today and bringing someone home with me, would you be able to leave before I get home".
A jump can land perfectly backwards and have more than 1/4 turn on the ice because of not checking the landing. Strictly speaking, most jumps have more than 1/4 turn of natural turning glide on the landing anyway, if the skater is holding the landing out. This looks different than a faster turn of course, the kind of turn seen when someone is "rotating on ice", but the blade is still turning on the landing. Commonly a skater might land a jump within 1/4 turn of being backwards (let's say exactly 1/4 short) and do a noticeable half-rotation on the ice afterwards. Just because they turned so much on the ice, it doesn't mean they were underrotated more than 1/4 turn on the jump itself.
Furthermore, a "jump" in the objective sense of the term is not strictly supposed to land backwards. Doing "1.5" and "2.5" jumps are actual skills that could be tested. Someone could potentially land forwards and go right into an axel jump, as a jump combination. "Underrotated" jumps are already recognized with their own base values. Underrotated quad jumps are very difficult in their own right and worth more points than a triple, regardless of "having more than 1/4 turn on the landing". Doing a Triple Lutz with 0 pre-rotation and landing slightly short of 1/4 on the landing is more difficult than doing a Triple Lutz with 1/2 turn pre-rotation and landing slightly past 1/4 on the landing.
Not true. Karen's jumps I'm talking about at Japan Open (and in the past) were within 1/4 turn entirely by looking at the start point of the jump, not because she pre-rotated less than 1/2 turn on them and deserves extra credit for it. She pre-rotates way less on her 3Toe combos than most other ladies these days (seeing as how almost everyone else pre-rotates MORE than 1/2 turn on them) and that's the comparison I am always making about her jump combo.
One thing I'd do if I were the US Federation is to try to get the GPF in North America every year ...
... and work to make that the biggest figure skating media event of the year. The 2nd best thing to having the best skater in the world is to have the best skaters in the world shown live in a big event.
No, it does not need to rotate. If the GPF were always in North America then Worlds could rotate between Europe and Asia.
The big events rotating every year makes it much less valuable(practically worthless now) for the media outlets. Figure skating is completely unable to offer any continent a live event with the best quality skaters year to year. And because of this figure skating has a hard time developing viewership habits and traditions. None of the top sports that care about viewership numbers are like figure skating in this regard.
For some reason, the United States just is not interested in the stars of other countries. When U.S. skaters stopped winning championships, we just gave up on the sport altogether.
The ladies skate last, so more recovery time for the lone US lady skating Team. I don't think it will be Ashley, because she's "been there, done that" in terms of team, and objectively speaking, her recovery time would be greater. A younger skater will get her Olympic medal on team.
This would be true IF any younger U.S. skater can demonstrate any consistency in putting out two decent programs in the same competition. Even when Ashley doesn't skate her best, she always can be counted on to deliver a certain base score & to not implode. Karen & Mariah (and Gracie, if she returns in form) have higher potential scores, but also have shown that bombing is a possibility. The wildcard is Mirai, who has been showing improved BV & consistency.
I guess USFS will have to weigh risk/reward. Ashley is the "safe" choice, but will the fed want to shoot for a higher medal with someone less proven?
One hopes that commercial endorsements and an Olympic medal (of any color) for Nathan Chen might be nice in driving some interest. Men's skating has never had the appeal of ladies in the US, but I don't think the US has had any "cool" men contending for OGM since Brian Boitano. Johnny Weir, arguably, but his appeal was also polarizing to certain populations. Todd, Michael Weiss, Tim, Evan - Nathan is cooler than all of them.
What the US needs is another Battle of the Brian's style rivalry. Maybe Nathan and Hanyu will battle it out all season and finish 1-2 at GPF. That will create a buzz among skating fans and hopefully drag the general public in as well. If a good marketing team gets a hold of it, like they did in 1988, we could see big ratings here in the US. Here's a brief column on Brian and Brian. https://www.olympic.org/news/re-live-the-battle-of-the-brians
The current men's field is wayyyyy too deep for a one-on-one rivalry. Which is great for the sport, but I don't think it is as compelling for new audiences because it's too complicated.
On Ashley's Instagram story she says she's working on new choreography with Shae Lynn. Didn't say for which program.
Did anyone catch the latest TSL where they call Ashley "TOS"?
Mariah has higher scoring potential over Ashley? Mariah's highest scores don't come close to Ashley's best scores. It's not like Mariah is a jumping machine her jumps are fine but nothing spectacular and her PCS will always be lagging behind Ashley. If other skaters underperform Ashley could sneak onto the podium at the Olympics but Mariah simply isn't in the mix internationally right now except for SA last year she hasn't had great results.