- Joined
- Dec 5, 2018
[replying to NoviceFanI love facts... but those things you are citing are NOT facts - they are opinion. Maybe valid and well-founded opinion (according to you and some), but they are not facts but opinion. Unless we have some objective measure of what is great, good, maybe some, little - and compare them objectively against your assertions, then they are just opinion.]
Well, I mean having the second highest loop and flip, the third lowest PR for lutz, flip and loop and a massive delay in rotation should qualify as a good jumper right? Barring the URs of course. Let's just say 2016-18 Masha was a great jumper, she's still great, but oh URs...
Well, those things sound pretty facty to me. Can we say fact-based opinion? Opinion-laced fact?
Another example (of many among this melee). Someone here said a few pages ago (i.e. a day or so ago) to the effect If Shabotova improves her little jumps and sluggish speed, she could be quite good. That's funny, I thought, I thought I thought differently. So I went back and looked at as many vids as I could find from this season. There are lots. What I saw there is what I remembered. Fast rotation. High jumps. Quick speed. No numbers, no measurements (although there are the tools). But still, those qualities are there in plain sight. Facts need not necessarily be quantifiable or measurable. There are heuristic facts, not just empirical ones. We might debate the finer points but terms like little jumps in the face of big jumps, and so on... cannot be reduced to "not-fact" and therefore "all-opinion" Facts are open to argument, open to opinion... If it were that easy, there'd be no need for lawcourts.