But those are big “ifs” and an assumption that there was “poor” judging? I certainly don’t believe that there has been “poor judging” in the past GPs, so I am accepting nothing. So truly, with no consensus, how do we decide?
Outraged fans?
Aggrieved feds?
Coaches?
Goldenskate?
I was responding to this ...
The judges and tech panel use their eyes to judge just like we do, sometimes they miss things, other times they might even get things wrong.
...and my perceived impression was that this poster (as have others) was suggesting that we should just get over it because that’s just how things are. In this instance it’s not about what we believe or what motives may underpin the discussion but simply addressing the point brought forth...”other times they might even get things wrong”.