I fully agree that both the questions you raise are important points to be addressed. I wonder whether a single run-through early in the season is the best way to assess them, or whether visits by USFS officials or--if enough trust could be created--honest conversations with coaches and skaters about a Plan B or about gradually increasing difficulty over the season might give better information and results. Ideally by August everybody would be prepared to skate their full competitive programs, but I can imagine that all sorts of situations might make that impossible. With several skaters joining Stars on Ice for the first time (I think) in this post-Olympic year, for example, I imagine that a number of Champs Camp attendees have had different off-season and summer training schedules than they're used to, and may still be gaining the comfort with their programs that they would normally expect to have at this point. (I'm really thinking here of the poster who mentioned that it was said that Bradie was doing doubles.)
Another "best of both worlds" scenario, though this might be too time-consuming: wouldn't it be great if the skaters could spend one day doing their programs individually for feedback, marking jumps if necessary to show the choreography to its best advantage, and another day having a simulated competition, doing their full planned content and being marked accordingly?
But Bradie did all her jumps with the new programs at a summer comp. So it would be weird for her to only do doubles at Camp. Unless she's dealing with a minor injury.