Everyone has an issue somewhere. The best jumper I've ever seen technique-wise across the board on the ladies side is Tuktamysheva, but then her flaw is fewer transitions as a result. I'm happy with the ISU deciding to incentivise skaters to do difficult combinations by not being super strict on pre-rotation and pushing the sport forwards.
Skaters aren't actually doing difficult combinations if they are overly cheating them. The sport is not being "pushed forward" by low quality jumps. It's harder to do 3Lutz+2Toe with great technique than 3Lutz+3Toe with poor technique. The entire reason of why Triple-Triples are supposed to be difficult is because of needing to control the first jump well enough to properly VAULT into the air for the next jump. If the first jump of a combo is smaller and executed questionably, and then the next one spins around on the ice for 3/4 of a turn (and doesn't land fully backwards), so the skater doesn't actually have to attempt full rotation, then a large amount of the difficultly has been removed.
Fewer transitions is accounted for in the score and it's not good for the sport to see low quality jumps so that people can just throw random transitions into the program for the sake of. It's possible to do high quality jumps from transitions anyway. Quite difficult to do so, but that's the point of rewarding transitions. The jump is supposed to be harder because of the transition, not be much lower quality just so that a skater can say they are doing a transition. Or at least, if that IS what a skater chooses to do, then they need to be marked appropriately.