LOL. Whatever.
And my suggestion is that other people loosen up on claims of under/overscoring...
...unless they can justify their claims using the same terms the judges use. Instead of basing them on "impressions from people" as you call it (what, you mean like "I love this skater so they deserve more points"?), or partial/incomplete assessments, conspiracy theories, etc etc.
Yeah, I guess it's annoying to have someone spoil the outrage parties, by asking for reasoned arguments or pointing out the deficiencies/fallacies of the under- or over-scoring claims. Sorry about that... but not really ;-D
I could not care less about people spoil the "outrage parties". and I like different people post their independent opinions.
and of course it is your prerogative to suggest other people to "loosen up". I wish you good luck.
Last edited: