My thoughts...
General politics:
1. Homeflation. Yep, Bradie could have gotten less GOE and PCs, and Liza more.
2. All-russian GPF is a nope, same as an all-russian JGPF. It is actually understandable.
3. Too many top senior ladies for rusfed to politik for them all. Again, understandable, they just have so much leverage, and they got to make choices. And they are not willing to support Liza, they made it pretty clear last year.
Liza's own issues:
1. While yes she has 3As, her overall layout is kind of meh compared to other top skaters, so she wins points on 3As and loses points on other jumps. Lets compare Liza with other top skaters. Liza's BV for SP is 23.99, and for FS is 51.52. Zagitova (with 0 triple axels), got 19.93 in SP and 47.84 in FS last year, which is "just" 8 points difference. Yeah, Liza gets extra 3x5.7 for doing 3 3As instead of 3 2As, but then she wastes a lot of those points in a non optimal layout.
2. Non jump elements. Step sequences and jumps, consistently not lv4. Each thing may be small, but think 1 point on each and it adds up. Then there is GOE and stuff, which also objectively lacks on the non jump elements, and it also adds up.
3. Components. Her programs this year are looking pretty meh, compared to what she had last year, for example.
So on one hand, she is yes underscored. But then she also leaves the door wide open.
General politics:
1. Homeflation. Yep, Bradie could have gotten less GOE and PCs, and Liza more.
2. All-russian GPF is a nope, same as an all-russian JGPF. It is actually understandable.
3. Too many top senior ladies for rusfed to politik for them all. Again, understandable, they just have so much leverage, and they got to make choices. And they are not willing to support Liza, they made it pretty clear last year.
Liza's own issues:
1. While yes she has 3As, her overall layout is kind of meh compared to other top skaters, so she wins points on 3As and loses points on other jumps. Lets compare Liza with other top skaters. Liza's BV for SP is 23.99, and for FS is 51.52. Zagitova (with 0 triple axels), got 19.93 in SP and 47.84 in FS last year, which is "just" 8 points difference. Yeah, Liza gets extra 3x5.7 for doing 3 3As instead of 3 2As, but then she wastes a lot of those points in a non optimal layout.
2. Non jump elements. Step sequences and jumps, consistently not lv4. Each thing may be small, but think 1 point on each and it adds up. Then there is GOE and stuff, which also objectively lacks on the non jump elements, and it also adds up.
3. Components. Her programs this year are looking pretty meh, compared to what she had last year, for example.
So on one hand, she is yes underscored. But then she also leaves the door wide open.