While watching Europeans there were a number of 15 and 16 year old skaters. Sepcenko, Jyrkinen, Repond.
It caused me to recall the the impassioned words of Eric Radford to the ISU last year.
"The life of an athlete is short and intense, their experience in this short phase sets the platform for the rest of their lives -- physically, spiritually emotionally."
"While I hear the concerns of certain nations about the immediate difficulty that they might face with this proposal being passed ... is a medal really worth the life of a young athlete?"
While it is well within the rules to send 15 and 16 year old children to international competitions for the time being, knowing the dangers to these children, shouldn't federations be taking the initiative and only keeping 15 and 16 year olds home until they are mature enough to compete with older skaters? We've established that it is too unhealthy to have 15 and 16 year olds skating in adult international competitions, therefore morally and ethically how can they possibly still be sending 15 and 16 year olds to these competitions. It's quite bizarre. It doesn't suddenly become damaging in two years when the rule comes into full effect, it's inflicting damage on these girls now.
It feels like their are countries out there exploiting this rule (and the children) for the sake of a competition or potential medal.
As Eric Radford said, is a medal really worth the life of an athlete?
It caused me to recall the the impassioned words of Eric Radford to the ISU last year.
"The life of an athlete is short and intense, their experience in this short phase sets the platform for the rest of their lives -- physically, spiritually emotionally."
"While I hear the concerns of certain nations about the immediate difficulty that they might face with this proposal being passed ... is a medal really worth the life of a young athlete?"
While it is well within the rules to send 15 and 16 year old children to international competitions for the time being, knowing the dangers to these children, shouldn't federations be taking the initiative and only keeping 15 and 16 year olds home until they are mature enough to compete with older skaters? We've established that it is too unhealthy to have 15 and 16 year olds skating in adult international competitions, therefore morally and ethically how can they possibly still be sending 15 and 16 year olds to these competitions. It's quite bizarre. It doesn't suddenly become damaging in two years when the rule comes into full effect, it's inflicting damage on these girls now.
It feels like their are countries out there exploiting this rule (and the children) for the sake of a competition or potential medal.
As Eric Radford said, is a medal really worth the life of an athlete?