- Joined
- Nov 19, 2010
So just out of curiosity, Kovtun got 98 in SP in Russia Nationals, was it so much better than this? Didn´t see any videos...
He made mistakes and the continental inflation is no match for the national inflation.
So just out of curiosity, Kovtun got 98 in SP in Russia Nationals, was it so much better than this? Didn´t see any videos...
Nice, thanks! Some videos are already up from folks (okay quality), so I won't be in any hurry to put up mine.
But here's my much better version of Brezina's SP:
2015 European Championships - Michal Brezina SP B.ESP2 (1080p HD)
Nice, thanks! Some videos are already up from folks (okay quality), so I won't be in any hurry to put up mine.
But here's my much better version of Brezina's SP:
2015 European Championships - Michal Brezina SP B.ESP2 (1080p HD)
National inflation, of course, but basically he was clean, if I remember well. Here is the program: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mC7xnj3hvk
Leaving aside the inflation at nationals, this one was bad even for him.
But the performances should have had more difference in GOE. Sergey's 4T+3T should have got more GOE while Javier's combination more negative GOE than -1.10. If the fall normally causes the components to go down, why stepping out would not then? The difference between clean performance and a messy one should reflect on components. In addition, Brezina fell but his components are still higher than Sergey's, and I don't understand why? All I think is that EC wants to support two non-Russian European skaters who pretend on the podium, because there are too many Russians on the top of other FS categories.8 points are completely fair. Javi's BV only was 43.25 while Voronov had 36.64. Add to that the components: SS, Choreo, Transitions (I'll leave IN and PE out) and the 8 points are there.
But the performances should have had more difference in GOE. Sergey's 4T+3T should have got more GOE while Javier's combination more negative GOE than -1.10. If the fall normally causes the components to go down, why stepping out would not then? The difference between clean performance and a messy one should reflect on components. In addition, Brezina fell but his components are still higher than Sergey's, and I don't understand why? All I think is that EC wants to support two non-Russian European skaters who pretend on the podium, because there are too many Russians on the top of other FS categories.
Certainly, the only way Sergey could lose so much points to Javi is if the latest one skated a clean program. But he did not.
there are differences as big as a house in the way Fernandez and Voronov approach their jumps
Voronov's jumps are impressive, and I like the guy - great attitude, humble hard worker. But Brezina imo has a crispness during the entire program that Voronov doesn't have. Brezina was great with 1 nasty moment, where Voronov was consistently good. I'd give today's SP of Brezina higher PCS than Voronov's (and Kovtun's, OF COURSE!) any day.But the performances should have had more difference in GOE. Sergey's 4T+3T should have got more GOE while Javier's combination more negative GOE than -1.10. If the fall normally causes the components to go down, why stepping out would not then? The difference between clean performance and a messy one should reflect on components. In addition, Brezina fell but his components are still higher than Sergey's, and I don't understand why? All I think is that EC wants to support two non-Russian European skaters who pretend on the podium, because there are too many Russians on the top of other FS categories.
Certainly, the only way Sergey could lose so much points to Javi is if the latest one skated a clean program. But he did not.
Ok, but why there is still 0.43 difference for Javi in P? Would not a clean program vs not clean affect P the most?Also, speed, Ch and IN I'd also give to Fernandez.
But the performances should have had more difference in GOE. Sergey's 4T+3T should have got more GOE while Javier's combination more negative GOE than -1.10. If the fall normally causes the components to go down, why stepping out would not then? The difference between clean performance and a messy one should reflect on components.
In addition, Brezina fell but his components are still higher than Sergey's, and I don't understand why?
He indeed got negative GoE's and the difference between a clean performance and a messy one is there. But you are comparing him with Voronov, and the reasons why he has 8 points lead are there and it is fair. The step out did cost him, but it's not the same as a fall. Sergei did miss the A, which really did cost him, otherwise the difference would've been 2-3 points maybe, at maz. The only positive GoE's that Javi did not deserve are the ones for the StSq. His execution was not that good here and he also did stumble, yet he got two +3 six +2 GoE and only one judge +1. I think only one judge fot it right.
I agree with you there but the difference is not even one point higher though. So not a big deal.
Still, according to protocols and as you are saying, even if Sergey did a clean triple axel instead of double he would have 2-3 points less than Javi's two pretty bad step-outs? yes, Sergey does not have the same entertaining charisma and speed, but still, he is as experienced skater as Javier, there should not be a difference in judging them.
I like the Menshov voodoo doll theory.
I like the Menshov voodoo doll theory.
Still, according to protocols and as you are saying, even if Sergey did a clean triple axel instead of double he would have 2-3 points less than Javi's two pretty bad step-outs? yes, Sergey does not have the same entertaining charisma and speed, but still, he is as experienced skater as Javier, there should not be a difference in judging them.
....um, someone somewhere in the thread brought up Menshov and voodoo dolls, and I liked it as a theory.... and how is Alena involved? (He's dating Maria, right?) I also think someone said something similar in 2012 about either worlds or WTT....