Semantics. The technical panel is still "judging" (giving their judgement) on rotation/edge and levels.
It was not "borderline" in this case.
In your opinion.
With all due respect MaxSwagg, if you can somehow conclude definitively by watching that video feed, you have amazing vision and need to consider some sort of career that makes use of this vision. I'm not being sarcastic. That video feed was NOT good at all. And we don't know what video feed the tech panel watched or even if it was reviewed. The video feed snagged out, but it seems like they didn't have to wait that long for his score, which tells me they either didn't review it or it didn't take too long for them to decide.
I don't see what this European tech panel has to gain by looking the other way.
Anyway, it's one data point. It will be interesting to see whether this scoring/technical calling/judging is consistent or it will prove to be generous. It's hard to determine after one event.
Last edited: