I've been watching figure skating on Swedish Eurosport the last years, and they've never really liked Hanyu (I believe). They are rarely super impressed, and even when he does well they'll say something like, it's his reputation as a xxx-champion. They don't really appreciate his skating skills but have they've been hyping Nathan since the last year. If I remember correctly they might have said that Nathan was more of a complete package compared to Hanyu (Don't quote me on this). It's not fun listening to them when Hanyu has a bad skate, I've honestly been dreading having to watch the olympics with them commentating. (They do however take notice of things like people not having steps into the solo jump in the SP, not having correct positions in spins and not having a balanced jump layout regarding skating in only clockwise/counterclockwise circles and jumping (which they mention every time Zagitova skates her LP) and so on). I haven't heard their commentary for the men's though, hoping it wasn't too bad!
Fascinating! Thank you for the insight! I only watched the Swedish commentary for the final group (+ Vincent) and it's the first time I've heard such blase attitude towards Hanyu. I'm in Norway, and they were fawning over him just like most English speaking commentary does. Actually I've lived outside of Norway since before Sochi so this is the first time I'm hearing these people talk about him, but the Norwegians have always been very enthusiastic about "complete" skaters while down on "jumpers" (they were not particularly there for Bychenko in the Team SP for example, even though he was the only one with a quad to go clean, they also weren't very enthusiastic about Javi back in the day, but this is before Sochi so maybe he was very different back then idk), so Hanyu is the typical skater they would get behind.