Actually, I'm not sure it is. Yuma has absolutely amazing SS. I would question the Performance, Composition, and Interpretation scores more...
I don't know, I think giving out a 10 is unrealistic and exaggerated. It is kindergarten to me. I expect that from teenage fanboys, but not from mature judges who should know there is no perfection. I would never give it to anyone. But giving it to an 18-year-old in a short program where he himself states that there is still a lot to improve... no. And yes, the other components are of course not less ridiculous. It seems when the judges see a (more or less) surprisingly good program, the only question left for them is whether to give a 9,0; 9,25; 9,50 or 9,75 and when they belong to Russia or today also Japan, they just add a bit more because those skaters must be quality material already because of their nationality. That's insane and random. If it was realistic, some component would be 6,75, another 7,50 and another maybe 8,25. They just don't distinguish. And maybe it is not possible within the short time span. Another bad thing is the one-sidedly (positive) inflated GOE's. If I touch the ground, I can't get away with 0 or with -0,something. There must be congruency between positive and negative GOE's, otherwise they make no sense. Sometimes I think the judges are paid according to the points they give. The more points, the more they get.
Last edited: