The criticism towards Jasons san quad is valid because he is clearly being propped as US #1 to the nth degree by his federation. The criticism wouldn't have happened if he is considered as #2 or #3. This is a sport. At this level, you skate to win. By selecting him, US federation sabotaged their own skaters by sending out the wrong messages to the ISU judges, going we just don't think our quads men are that good actually.
Although Jason is the only one that skate the lights out out of the US men and re-enforce his #1 status, he has also proved that at his absolute best, he can only be considered 5th best against these quads men however flawed and mistake prone they are.
His excellent performance and placement proves the quads criticisms are valid. Although there are alot to appreciate in his skating and his improvements are tremendous, but he doesn't have the fire power if US is seriously thinking about a podium finish.
Not true. Joshua Farris was thisclose to winning. He would have tied Jason in the SP had he not made that error on his 3-3 and missed a spin level. Same with the FS (i.e. didn't zayak). He got the highest PCS in that segment, not Jason.
Jason wasn't even a factor in fall 2013 for Sochi. Kori was told numerous times that wanted a U.S. man with two quads. She basically had to build a skating program from the ground up because she couldn't get in to World Arena. Basically USFSA got on the bandwagon after the fact when 1.) He medaled on the GP 2.) Beat everyone but Jeremy at Nationals and 3.) Became a viral sensation with his Riverdance FS.
Even while struggling this past fall/GP Season, he still managed some of the top scores among the top men in the GP and would have made the GP Final had Jeremy Abbott finished 0.16 points higher at NHK (i.e. beating Yuzuru, who too was struggling). Joshua was a mess at NHK. The other men were sluggish too. If Jason was a favorite, it was only cause he performed well to others.
But it was clear that once 2013 Jr. Worlds champ Joshua Farris (not the NHK 2014 Josh) showed up at Nationals, all bets were off, as we could see from the PCS scores. They were basically tied. When Josh won silver at 4CC and Jason struggled (relatively speaking), Josh suddenly became the one who could help the U.S. medal. In Sam Auxiller's (USFSA president) interview with Here and Now, the National Public Radio news show, he doesn't mention Jason at all. He mentions Josh as the most likely medal threat because he does quads.
By selecting him, US federation sabotaged their own skaters by sending out the wrong messages to the ISU judges, going we just don't think our quads men are that good actually.
Actually it's the exact opposite, USFS is following the lead of ISU judges. ISU judges have continued to give Jason the highest PCS marks among all the U.S. men. The only one who scored higher was Jeremy Abbott and that's not by much. ISU judges gave Jason a 75+ with a flawed quadless program at RC while Max barely beat him with a 76+ score with a 4S-2T, 3A, 3Z.
As to Jason's performance at Worlds:
FWIW, Jason was not at his absolutely technical best at the Worlds FS (his technical best was at 4CC), while it was arguably his best performance wise. He actually ticked up PCS by one point (he got 83+ at 4CC), but he scored 5 points less in TES compared to 4CC, due to the 3A<< ,primarily. He lost 10+ points between that error and the one on his 3Z-1L-3S combo, so actually the margin would have been much closer had he not made those errors.
He doesn't have maximum firepower NOW...which is why he didn't get a medal. But he had enough firepower to get 4th and help US get three spots in his first Worlds. Let's wait and see where he goes from here.
The criticism, iMO, comes down to this: Jason is not putting enough urgency in getting the quad in the eyes of some people and that somehow he's not apologetic for it. That seems to be the heart of the issue.
Ultimately all Jason can do is keep training the quad, do what he can with the skills he has and see where he places.
Last edited: