"This programme doesn't feel like a competitive routine that she's rushing to the end of, it feels like a proper piece that she is leading you through"
How do you know all of it ,if she skates the same program every year. the same layout,jumps etc..I judt dont get it, if some let me understand it ,not just bullying with being a hater.What is the meaning of "INT" in PCS score if half part of the program are just jumps? The piece that she is leading you through is firs part of the program? Because when she ends first half doing her STSEQ, i think "Oh theres only jumps left!"End of the program. As a piece it dosnt work
I don't know, maybe because even though all her jumps are in one half, she has more imaginative choreography that crossovers on the short sides into a jump? Maybe because it feels in her programme like her jumps are just 'there' rather than being the centrepiece that the whole programme is built around? Her elements are brilliant, but the programme is choreographed so that it is so much more than 7 individual elements strung together with crossovers and the occasional mohawk. Not a criticism, but 75% of skaters have exactly the same layout (jump, jump, spin, stsq, jump, spin, spin.) that they do year after year because it works for them so I feel that argument is entirely pointless unless you fancy pulling up most of the skating world, and if you can't spot differences between her programmes, you're probably not paying enough attention