Cool. Thank you. So it wouldn't make any difference to who won or lost, but itis perhaps a more audience-friendly way of displaying the results (or at least a familiar one -- everybody understands rating something from 1 to 10). It might appeal to those fans who complain about the IJS that they don't really understand where all those numbers come from (but are not curious enough to find out).
I am reminded of the scoring at the Aurora Games show earlier this year. A couple of skaters got perfect tens. Then Ayssa Liu skated and did a quad Lutz, so they had to give her a 10.5.
On the other hand, many fans like to see the running total in the little score box for the excitement of watching their favorite gaining and gaining on the current leader.
Yes, though it would be possible to show an indicative score as you went along - skating fans are used to the final TES adjusting as the skater comes off the ice, even for clean skates.
However what you couldn't do is show individual elements and GOEs. For example Anna Shcherbakova might have a competition where every single judge gave her 100 in TES, but after knocking off the highest and lowest scores her final TES would be 87.5 i.e. 12.5 * 7. However this would be different than the underlying TES of 100.
Hence you could do something that showed a score as you went along, knowing that it wouldn't be quite the final figure, but you couldn't show her score for a quad lutz as BV 11.5 + whatever the GOE was, all you could do is add in 7/8ths of the figure to the current running total, bit like you used to get until the last couple of years when they starting showing individual elements + GOEs.
Similarly you'd have the problem of elements effectively having different values for different disciplines. E.g. Nathan Chen's TES of 125 would convert to 12.5 as would Anna Shcherbakova's of 100, but they're still performing elements with the same underling BV and GOEs, so yet again any question of showing individual element scores would be out of the question.
However overall this would have to be balanced against the benefits of having a more user friendly way of displaying the results. Personally I’d be pretty much on the fence when it came to this, my post was more about showing that it was possible, that you could have 6.0 presentation and all that came with it, but also with IJS scoring underlying it all.
Finally one other thing is that you’d lose the fine details of losing the highest and lowest GOEs on a particular element or PCS category. However this wouldn’t make a whole lot of difference. I’ve done exercises where I’ve knocked off the highest and lowest judges’ tallies and averaged the rest and it doesn’t make a whole lot of difference. E.g. in the Yazuru Hanyu example in my post above his Total Segment Score would have changed to 188.05 from 188.60 if you knock off the highest and lowest overall totals and average out the rest, so all the fine detail of knocking off highest and lowest GOEs etc. doesn’t really add up to that much.