That isn't what I said. Posters were saying L/L were a shoo-in for gold based on their scores at the JWC. What I said was the event was more competitive than they thought, because of summer competition results (Lake Placid) where the top Russians and the Americans had competed, and that Lajoie / Lagha's summer comp scores from Quebec were inflated, and yes, they were inflated.
I looked at the Quebec protocols compared to the Brisbane protocols, and the Quebec GOE (TES-BV) was 4.5 greater than the Brisbane GOE in the SD, and 4.0 greater in the FD. That difference is far greater than the value of the difference between TW4 and TW3. And the Quebec PCS was 2.35 points greater for the SD and 3.89 for the FD. While BV is based on what was technically executed, GOE and PCS are quite subjective, and you would expect a panel of home-based judges to score higher than a panel of international judges---and obviously, they did.
Meanwhile, Lewis/Bye skated quite badly, with many more mistakes than they did at Lake Placid, so their scores went way down, especially in the SD.
You can look at scores as an estimate of what a skater can do. Club competitions usually have a majority of judges from the home country, while ISU competitions like Asian Open, Lake Placid and Philadelphia Intl have international judges. IMO, ISU competitions are more reliable scorewise, so Camden Pulkinen's 195 at Skate Detroit isn't necessarily better than the upper 180s scored at the Asian Open.
When you don't have summer comp scores, which is usually the case for the Russian skaters, the only scores available are SBs or other data from the late season. But you do have to recognize that those scores aren't comparable NOW. The same was true for Lajoie / Lagha's WJC score. They were not going to skate up to a late season level in August, so that score (148.26) was unlikely. And their Quebec score (152.70) was way out of the ballpark. No wonder they were disappointed with the 138.92 they scored at Brisbane, when their expectations were geared up so high.
actually, they were simply disappointed about their twizzles mistakes... scores weren't even up and they looked sad about their skate.
I will say it one last time : skaters at that elite level already KNOW that scores are irrelevant and will vary from event to event.... they are not dumb... they weren't surely expecting to score as high as in other events... but probably had objectives about skating clean or hitting their levels... that's what they were disappointed about... they were not disappointed about not getting a score as high as their previous ones.... they know their sport better than that.
I do not buy your argument that giving higher GOE and PCS to a team at a local event is creating expectations for them... what matters is how they skate and they are aware of what they can do and cannot do.