Osmond's second 3T got <<. I don't know, to me Gracie and Kaetlyn did the same mistake, falling on the second part of the combo. Is it so important that one rotated the combo and the other one didn't as long as both finished on their butt? Looking at the points, it seems so, but IMO, it shouldn't. I hate that a fall is not as severe as an <<. I think a fall on element should make the element not count at all (and if a skater falls on the second part of the combo, give him the credit for the landed jump and apply -GOE). Keep the "<<" penalty, there should be a big difference between landing a rotated jump and failing to rotate it even if there is no fall. But rotated or not, a fall on a jump should be the most severe penalty IMO
It's stupid that Gracie got more points than Kaetlyn for the completely missed 3T IMO
It's stupid that Gracie got more points than Kaetlyn for the completely missed 3T IMO