- Joined
- Dec 7, 2019
There is no connection here. mix different things.
The difference in TEC can be even twofold or more, it really exists. So what? What balance can there be?
If you want to see the triumph of beautiful ice skating over ugly Ultra C programs - make the PC factor for lady 2.0 instead of 0.8. And soon no one will bother you with quadruple jumps.
jumps are not ugly as beautiful skating is not boring.
I want balance, conscious that the definition of balance is different between each one of us, so I want something who pushes skater to work all aroung starting from they're weak points.
I'm also conscious that the evaluation of PCS is
a) unsatisfying because we have 5 categories but the vote for a single skaters seems to be little adjustements over a base PCS "global" vote (like 8.5. 8.25. 8.75, 8.5, 9.0)
b) they're exposed to manipulation and the past of ISU is not crystal clear. You can manipulate GOE too of course but it will become clear as we could all review the single elements.
TES difference between 1st and 5th/6that the EU will probably be more I agree, but that does not bother me. It's ok because of the actual difference in skills.
Likewyse I would not consider outrageous or fictional a difference of 15 PCS points between the 1st and the 5th/6th PCS score: it's just 6% of the total score.
PCS multiplyer should be paired with men since ladies TES is now comparable to men's (Sasha's program could be a top men program)