She hits 5 bullets, at least, so +1 as well looks low to me.
I've practically written a thesis on her jumps in last year's threads and why Julia easily satisfies many aspects in awarding GOE.
I think some people assume that GOE is awarded by comparing jumps from skater to skater when in fact CoP simply requires you to satisfy certain qualifications. They don't give a bullet to one skater for height and withhold it from other skaters who aren't as high. That's 6.0 thinking that still lingers around and while I'm starting to think 6.0 would be better (although results would probably be the same) because people quibble over PCS and edge calls as if these are the actually definitively quantifiable and lose sight of the programs as a whole and maybe even the importance the whole effort should carry.
I love big jumps too but still can see merit in smaller ones ...especially if they satisfy the most basic of qualifications like fully rotated and correct entry. Personally...I don't like the idea of events being decided almost solely by jumps....especially when spins are judged so leniently in comparison. I think Mathman secretly worked some voodoo magic to convert me to a 6.0 supporter.